1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1997 Ford F-150
To start off, 1997 Ford F-150 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1997 Ford F-150. (202 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford F-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 40 kg more than 1997 Ford F-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1997 Ford F-150 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Sixty | F-150 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2075 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3050 mm |
