1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer (280 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 207 kg more than 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1997 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Sixty | Lancer |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 280 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1908 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2610 mm |
