1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1998 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 1998 SsangYong Musso is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1998 SsangYong Musso | |
Make | Cadillac | SsangYong |
Model | Sixty | Musso |
Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |