1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1999 Mazda AZ
To start off, 1999 Mazda AZ is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1359 kg more than 1999 Mazda AZ.
Because 1999 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1999 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Sixty | AZ |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 756 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2370 mm |