1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2000 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2000 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Nissan Pathfinder is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2000 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | Sixty | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3274 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2710 mm |