1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2003 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2003 Ford Explorer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2003 Ford Explorer. (158 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Explorer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 165 kg more than 2003 Ford Explorer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2003 Ford Explorer | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Sixty | Explorer |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2840 mm |
