1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2003 Honda Z
To start off, 2003 Honda Z is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 2003 Honda Z. (51 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2003 Honda Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1155 kg more than 2003 Honda Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Honda Z is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Z will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2003 Honda Z | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | Sixty | Z |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 35 L |