1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (201 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 609 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Sixty | Tribute |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 62 L |