1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2009 Hummer H3
To start off, 2009 Hummer H3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Hummer H3 (239 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Hummer H3 weights approximately 79 kg more than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Hummer H3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Hummer H3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2009 Hummer H3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Hummer |
Model | Sixty | H3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 102 L |