1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2010 Aston Martin Rapide
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide (470 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin Rapide should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 165 kg more than 2010 Aston Martin Rapide.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2010 Aston Martin Rapide | |
Make | Cadillac | Aston Martin |
Model | Sixty | Rapide |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 470 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5019 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2141 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 90 L |