1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2010 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Express is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Express (323 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 611 kg more than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2010 Chevrolet Express | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Sixty | Express |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 323 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 2726 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5692 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2073 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 3429 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 117 L |