1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer (237 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 545 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Sixty | Lancer |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4572 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 55 L |