1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2011 Audi TT
To start off, 2011 Audi TT is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2011 Audi TT. (158 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2011 Audi TT.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2011 Audi TT | |
| Make | Cadillac | Audi |
| Model | Sixty | TT |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4201 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1359 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2469 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |
