1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | Sixty | RS3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 335 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |