1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (323 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 400 kg more than 2012 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 2012 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Sixty | Camaro |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 323 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 72 L |