1966 Checker Town vs. 2009 Mazda 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Checker Town. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Checker Town would be higher. At 3,766 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Checker Town is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1966 Checker Town. (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Checker Town.
Because 1966 Checker Town is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Checker Town. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Checker Town | 2009 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Checker | Mazda |
Model | Town | 5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3766 cc | 2258 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2760 mm |