1966 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 565 kg more than 1997 Mazda SW-X.
Because 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Chevrolet Caprice | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Caprice | SW-X |
Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1105 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 55 L |