1966 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2002 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 150 kg more than 2002 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Chevrolet Caprice | 2002 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Caprice | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 107 L |
