1966 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP) has 132 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Chevrolet Caprice | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Caprice | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2490 mm |
