1966 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2003 Mazda Washu

To start off, 2003 Mazda Washu is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Washu. (238 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Washu. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 254 kg more than 2003 Mazda Washu. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Washu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Chevrolet Caprice 2003 Mazda Washu
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Caprice Washu
Year Released 1966 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6476 cc 3500 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 275 HP 238 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1670 kg 1416 kg
Vehicle Length 5420 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 3210 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 50 L