1966 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2005 Mazda Marathon
To start off, 2005 Mazda Marathon is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Marathon. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Marathon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 153 kg more than 2005 Mazda Marathon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Chevrolet Caprice | 2005 Mazda Marathon | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Caprice | Marathon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Size | 6476 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 10 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1517 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 76 L |