1966 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1047 kg more than 1966 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Chevrolet Caprice | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Caprice | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 3628 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 2717 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 105 L |
