1966 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2009 Renault Clio

To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2009 Renault Clio. (111 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 140 kg more than 1966 Chevrolet Caprice.

Because 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Chevrolet Caprice 2009 Renault Clio
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Caprice Clio
Year Released 1966 2009
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6476 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 275 HP 111 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1670 kg 1810 kg
Vehicle Length 5420 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 2040 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1280 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 55 L