1966 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2010 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2010 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2010 Mazda RX-8. (232 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 280 kg more than 2010 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Chevrolet Caprice | 2010 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Caprice | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6476 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1341 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |