1966 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2010 Opel Combo
To start off, 2010 Opel Combo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice (275 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2010 Opel Combo. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Caprice should accelerate faster than 2010 Opel Combo.
Because 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Chevrolet Caprice | 2010 Opel Combo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
| Model | Caprice | Combo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6476 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 52 L |
