1966 Chevrolet Caprice vs. 2012 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2012 Nissan Leaf is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher.
Because 1966 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Chevrolet Caprice | 2012 Nissan Leaf | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Caprice | Leaf |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5420 mm | 4445 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |
