1966 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Corvette (425 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1984 Lotus Etna. (331 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1984 Lotus Etna.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Chevrolet Corvette | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
| Model | Corvette | Etna |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6999 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.2:1 |
| Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 290 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2520 mm |
