1966 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Corvette (425 HP) has 355 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 723 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Chevrolet Corvette | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Corvette | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 6999 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 70 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1463 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 1810 mm |
