1966 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2003 Holden UTE
To start off, 2003 Holden UTE is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Corvette (425 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 2003 Holden UTE. (204 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden UTE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden UTE weights approximately 37 kg more than 1966 Chevrolet Corvette.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Chevrolet Corvette | 2003 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Corvette | UTE |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6999 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1463 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2950 mm |