1966 Chevrolet Corvette vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chevrolet Corvette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chevrolet Corvette would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 183 kg more than 1966 Chevrolet Corvette.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Chevrolet Corvette. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Chevrolet Corvette | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Corvette | Condor |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6999 cc | 2436 cc |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1463 kg | 1646 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 70 L |
