1966 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 1997 Ford Taurus
To start off, 1997 Ford Taurus is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chrysler New Yorker is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Chrysler New Yorker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Chrysler New Yorker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Chrysler New Yorker | 1997 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | New Yorker | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7206 cc | 2962 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5870 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2760 mm |
