1966 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2000 Ford Equator
To start off, 2000 Ford Equator is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chrysler New Yorker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chrysler New Yorker (185 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2000 Ford Equator. (128 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chrysler New Yorker should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Equator. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Chrysler New Yorker weights approximately 955 kg more than 2000 Ford Equator. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Chrysler New Yorker (420 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Equator. (160 Nm). This means 1966 Chrysler New Yorker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Equator.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Chrysler New Yorker | 2000 Ford Equator | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | New Yorker | Equator |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7206 cc | 1787 cc |
| Horse Power | 185 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2163 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 3260 mm |
