1966 Chrysler New Yorker vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover

To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Chrysler New Yorker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Chrysler New Yorker would be higher. At 7,205 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chrysler New Yorker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1966 Chrysler New Yorker. (350 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1966 Chrysler New Yorker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 330 kg more than 1966 Chrysler New Yorker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Chrysler New Yorker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Chrysler New Yorker (651 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover. (570 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 Chrysler New Yorker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Land Rover Range Rover.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Chrysler New Yorker 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
Make Chrysler Land Rover
Model New Yorker Range Rover
Year Released 1966 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7205 cc 4197 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 350 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 651 Nm 570 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 9.1:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1956 kg 2286 kg
Vehicle Length 5570 mm 4980 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1960 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1910 mm
Wheelbase Size 3160 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 104 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]