1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 1978 Volvo 260
To start off, 1978 Volvo 260 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Volvo 260 weights approximately 790 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 1978 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | 260 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |