1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (81 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 890 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | 260 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |