1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1982 Toyota Celica is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 620 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | 2CV | Celica |
Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2640 mm |