1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 1999 Volvo C70
To start off, 1999 Volvo C70 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,433 cc (5 cylinders), 1999 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Volvo C70 (165 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Volvo C70 weights approximately 862 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 1999 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 2CV | C70 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2433 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1422 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |
