1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2000 Jaguar F-Type is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 372 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | 2CV | F-Type |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2390 mm |