1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 799 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 MCC ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 MCC ForTwo (40 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 MCC ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 MCC ForTwo weights approximately 170 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Citroen | MCC |
Model | 2CV | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1810 mm |