1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2002 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Rezzo (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 710 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2002 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Citroen | Daewoo |
| Model | 2CV | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |
