1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2002 MG TF
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 MG TF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MG TF (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MG TF should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG TF weights approximately 560 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2002 MG TF | |
| Make | Citroen | MG |
| Model | 2CV | TF |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |
