1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (187 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | 2CV | Tundra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3270 mm |