1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2003 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2003 Mazda Tribute is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda Tribute (122 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 865 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2003 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | 2CV | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1425 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 57 L |
