1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 214 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1127 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2005 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
| Model | 2CV | LS |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 232 HP |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |
