1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,724 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML (231 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 1560 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | Citroen | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 2CV | ML |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 3724 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 231 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2120 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 83 L |
