1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,499 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt (94 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 505 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2005 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
Model | 2CV | Colt |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 47 L |