1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 2296 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Mustang |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2856 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 61 L |