1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover (305 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 287 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 840 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Citroen | Land Rover |
Model | 2CV | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 104 L |