1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,399 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo S60 (128 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 1009 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | S60 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1569 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |