1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2009 Ford Taurus is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Taurus (263 HP @ 6251 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Taurus weights approximately 547 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Taurus |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6251 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1107 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 76 L |